Coverage by region
| Region | Highlights |
|---|---|
| North America | United States, Canada — deep metro and ISP coverage |
| Europe | UK, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Poland, Sweden |
| Asia-Pacific | Japan, South Korea, Singapore, India, Australia |
| Latin America | Brazil, Mexico and neighbouring markets |
| Middle East | United Arab Emirates and regional coverage |
Targeting levels
Country selection suits broad crawls. City selection matters wherever pricing, stock or ad delivery changes by metro. ISP selection is for targets that treat carriers differently. All three are set in the credential string, so one account can hold many combinations at once.
Popular destinations
Frequently asked questions
Does a specific country cost more?
No. Every location is priced the same — there is no geo surcharge.
How precise is city targeting?
Major metros are individually selectable, and ISP selection narrows it further where a target treats carriers differently.
Can one account use several countries at once?
Yes. Targeting travels in the credential, so parallel jobs can each hold a different market.
Which locations have the most IPs?
The United States and major European markets carry the deepest inventory, with Asia-Pacific growing fastest.
Why the exit country decides the data
Marketplaces, ad platforms and search engines all serve different results by region, and they do it before any account-level personalisation happens. A catalogue pulled from the wrong country is not a slightly skewed sample — it is a different dataset that happens to look plausible.
For account work the stakes are different but the rule is the same: an identity that claims to be in one market and connects from another is carrying a contradiction, and contradictions are what review systems are built to find.
Buying IPs in the right place
Buy addresses in the market the identity belongs to, and match the profile's timezone and language to it. Where a platform varies by metro — delivery, stock, regional pricing — select the city rather than accepting a national default. Every location costs the same per IP, so precision here is a decision about accuracy, never about budget.